School Admission Appeals

Refused a place at Warden Park Secondary Academy?

You are not alone. In 2026/27, 55 families who named Warden Park Secondary Academy as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 322 and 350 put it first.

Below: what an appeal in West Sussex actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.

1.09

first choices for every place available

350 first preferences for 322 places, 2026/27

Appealing a refusal at Warden Park Secondary Academy

There is no published appeal success rate for Warden Park Secondary Academy, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for West Sussex as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.

Across West Sussex, 19.9% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 239 of 1,199 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.

A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.

See the full appeal figures for West Sussex.

What a panel here can act on

These are national rules, not West Sussex ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.

How contested this school has been

Warden Park Secondary Academy turned first-choice families away in 11 of the last 12 years. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.

First preferences per place at Warden Park Secondary Academy, 2015/16 to 2026/27. A value above 1 means more families named the school first than there were places. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 one first preference per place 15/16 17/18 19/20 21/22 23/24 25/26 26/27 2015/16 1.23 per place 364 first choices 296 places 2016/17 1.22 per place 361 first choices 295 places 2017/18 1.1 per place 329 first choices 300 places 2018/19 1.15 per place 340 first choices 295 places 2019/20 1.12 per place 336 first choices 300 places 2020/21 1.01 per place 302 first choices 298 places 2021/22 1.17 per place 349 first choices 299 places 2022/23 1.15 per place 346 first choices 302 places 2023/24 1.02 per place 307 first choices 302 places 2024/25 0.91 per place 267 first choices 294 places 2025/26 1.07 per place 340 first choices 319 places 2026/27 1.09 per place 350 first choices 322 places
First preferences per place at Warden Park Secondary Academy. Years with too small an intake to carry a ratio are left blank rather than plotted. Latest year: 350 first preferences for 322 places.
View as a table
Places, first preferences and offers at Warden Park Secondary Academy, by year. A ratio is shown only where the intake is large enough to carry one.
Year Places First choices Offered Per place
2015/16 296 364 290 1.23
2016/17 295 361 290 1.22
2017/18 300 329 293 1.1
2018/19 295 340 289 1.15
2019/20 300 336 289 1.12
2020/21 298 302 286 1.01
2021/22 299 349 291 1.17
2022/23 302 346 289 1.15
2023/24 302 307 285 1.02
2024/25 294 267 252 0.91
2025/26 319 340 303 1.07
2026/27 322 350 295 1.09

Places offered

322

in 2026/27

Named first choice

350

821 named it at any preference

First choices offered a place

84.3%

295 of 350

Offers to families outside the council

1%

2 of 322 offers

How close you had to live

Warden Park Secondary Academy filled its places in 2026, and 2,027m — 1.26 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under criterion 10 , which is numbered in the school's own admission arrangements for that year.

Last place offered at

1.26 mi

2,027 metres, 2026

Under criterion

10

as numbered by the school

This is not a line you passed or failed

A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.

It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.

West Sussex Council, allocation statistics for 2026. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.

Was the school full?

This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.

Places, Years 7 to 11

1,500

2024/25, whole school

Pupils in them

1,531

102.1% of capacity

Over its capacity by

31

reported as full or beyond

Sixth form places

0

excluded from the figures above

Read this before you use these numbers

These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Warden Park Secondary Academy has room for your child.

They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.

On the published figures Warden Park Secondary Academy was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.

Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2011/12 to 2024/25

Places Pupils on roll

Places and pupils on roll at Warden Park Secondary Academy from 2011/12 to 2024/25. Where the roll meets the places line, the school is full. 0 800 1,600 places on roll 11/12 13/14 15/16 17/18 20/21 22/23 24/25 2011/12 1,500 places 1,485 on roll 2012/13 1,500 places 1,488 on roll 2013/14 1,500 places 1,493 on roll 2014/15 1,500 places 1,480 on roll 2015/16 1,500 places 1,484 on roll 2016/17 1,500 places 1,496 on roll 2017/18 1,500 places 1,484 on roll 2018/19 1,500 places 1,484 on roll 2020/21 1,500 places 1,476 on roll 2021/22 1,500 places 1,474 on roll 2022/23 1,500 places 1,511 on roll 2023/24 1,500 places 1,526 on roll 2024/25 1,500 places 1,531 on roll
Whole-school figures including any sixth form, as at 1 May each year. 2019/20 is missing because the 2020 School Capacity survey was cancelled.

Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.

What these figures do not tell you

About the school

Type
Academy converter
Admissions policy
Non-selective
Religious character
No religious character
Entry point
Year 7
Council
West Sussex

Postcode RH17 5DP. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 137416).

Other contested secondary schools in West Sussex

Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.