Check your grounds
Six questions. They tell you which of the recognised grounds your case rests on, which stage of the appeal each one bites at, and what a panel is not allowed to consider. It will tell you plainly if your case is weak — that is most of the value.
Nothing you enter leaves this page. There is no account, no email box and no submit button that sends anywhere. The questions are answered by a script running in your browser and nothing is stored, not even on your own device. Close the tab and it is gone.
The grounds in full
- Infant class size
Reception, Year 1 and Year 2 are capped at 30 pupils per teacher by law. A panel can only overturn a refusal on three narrow grounds, and how much your child needs the place is not one of them.
- A mistake in how the decision was made
The strongest ground there is, and the most underused. If the admission arrangements were unlawful or were applied wrongly — and you would have got a place otherwise — the panel must uphold the appeal.
- Distance and catchment
How the distance was measured, from where to where, and whether the same method was used for everyone. Measurement disputes are first-stage arguments, and they are checkable in a way most grounds are not.
- Siblings
Whether a brother or sister counts is decided by the school's own definition, not by common sense. Half-siblings, step-siblings, fostered children and a sibling in the sixth form are treated differently by different schools.
- Faith and religious criteria
Faith schools rank applicants on evidence of practice — attendance records, a form signed by a minister, baptism dates. Most faith appeals turn on whether that evidence was gathered and scored the way the published arrangements say.
- Medical and social need
The ground most parents lead with, and it is a second-stage argument almost every time. It works when it shows what this school can do for your child that the allocated school cannot — not how much you want it.
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
A child on SEN support has no automatic route to a named school, and it is an admission panel that hears the case — not the SEND Tribunal. It works as a second-stage argument about provision this school has and the allocated one does not.
- A late application
Two first-stage questions a panel can act on: whether it was right to treat your application as late at all, and whether your reason for being late is one the published arrangements say must be accepted anyway.
- In-year admissions
Applying outside the normal round — a house move, or a school that is not working out. The ordinary two-stage test applies on a much shorter timetable, and the year group will usually already be full.
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
A selection appeal and an oversubscription appeal are different things judged on different tests. If your child missed the qualifying score, the panel is asking whether they are of the required academic standard — not whether the school has room.
- Sixth form places
Post-16 admission runs on published entry requirements as well as oversubscription criteria, and the student gains a right of appeal of their own alongside their parents'. Where the refusal was about grades, the panel may not form its own view of the student's ability.
- Twins and multiple births
Where one twin is offered a place and the other refused, the excepted-pupil rule can admit the second over the infant class size limit rather than separate them. Above the infant years the limit falls away and it becomes an ordinary sibling or second-stage argument.
What this is, and what it is not
This sorts your situation against the tests in the School Admission Appeals Code. It is not legal advice, and it is not a prediction — nobody publishes appeal outcomes for individual schools, so no tool can tell you your chances at a named school. Across England 19.4% of appeals heard were upheld (22,402 of 115,695 appeals heard in 2024–2026), and infant class size appeals run at 9.4%.