Refused a place at St Oscar Romero Catholic School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 120 families who named St Oscar Romero Catholic School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 172 and 289 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in West Sussex actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
289 first preferences for 172 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at St Oscar Romero Catholic School
There is no published appeal success rate for St Oscar Romero Catholic School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for West Sussex as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across West Sussex, 19.9% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 239 of 1,199 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for West Sussex.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not West Sussex ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
St Oscar Romero Catholic School turned first-choice families away in 9 of the last 12 years. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 109 | 96 | 96 | 0.88 |
| 2016/17 | 111 | 92 | 92 | 0.83 |
| 2017/18 | 124 | 141 | 113 | 1.14 |
| 2018/19 | 135 | 129 | 118 | 0.96 |
| 2019/20 | 147 | 194 | 119 | 1.32 |
| 2020/21 | 179 | 196 | 159 | 1.09 |
| 2021/22 | 176 | 201 | 154 | 1.14 |
| 2022/23 | 180 | 255 | 170 | 1.42 |
| 2023/24 | 181 | 289 | 179 | 1.6 |
| 2024/25 | 177 | 306 | 176 | 1.73 |
| 2025/26 | 178 | 239 | 175 | 1.34 |
| 2026/27 | 172 | 289 | 169 | 1.68 |
Places offered
172
in 2026/27
Named first choice
289
681 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
58.5%
169 of 289
Offers to families outside the council
0%
0 of 172 offers
How close you had to live
St Oscar Romero Catholic School filled its places in 2026, and 6,388m — 3.97 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under criterion 8 , which is numbered in the school's own admission arrangements for that year.
Last place offered at
3.97 mi
6,388 metres, 2026
Under criterion
8
as numbered by the school
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
West Sussex Council, allocation statistics for 2026. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria St Oscar Romero Catholic School published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Other looked after children or previously looked after children (see note b.). |
| 2 | Catechumens, Candidates for Reception into the Church and children who are members of an Orthodox Church (see note d. & e.). If application is being made for a place at the school where the parent/carer is a Catechumen or Candidate for reception into the Church, evidence of their being a member of the Catechumenate of a Catholic Church or a Candidate for reception will be required. Proof of acceptance into the catechumenate, and evidence for a candidate, should be by letter from the appropriate priest. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 3 | Other children with a brother or sister (see note f.) at the school at the time of admission. |
| 4 | Other children who are considered to have an exceptional or compelling need, supported by written evidence (see note n.). |
| 5 | Children of Staff in either or both of the following circumstances: |
| a) A permanent member of staff that has been employed at the school for at least two years at the time of application (see note o.). | |
| b) A member of staff recruited to fill a vacant post for which there is a demonstrable skill shortage (see note o.) | |
| 6 | Other children currently attending one of the named feeder schools (see note k.). |
| 7 | Children of other Christian denominations (see note l.) whose membership is evidenced by a minister of religion. The application must be supported by either a certificate of baptism or a letter confirming membership of the Christian denomination, signed by the minister of religion |
| 8 | Children of other faiths (see note m.) whose membership is evidenced by a religious leader. The application must be supported by a letter confirming membership of that faith, signed by the faith leader. |
| 9 | Any other children. Final Tiebreaker: Priority will be given to children living closest to the school determined by the shortest distance (see note j.). ___________________________________________________________________________________ Application Procedure To apply for a place at this school in the normal admissions round, you should complete and return the following two forms: |
| 10 | The COMMON APPLICATION FORM (CAF) All applications for places must be made on the Common Application Form which is available either from the Local Authority (where the parent lives) or through that Local Authority’s website. For a valid application, the completed CAF must be returned either online or in the paper form by 31 October 2025. |
| 11 | The school’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FORM (SIF) This is available from the school and the school website and allows the Governors to put all applicants in order of priority for admission in line with the published admission policy. If you are expressing a preference for a place for your child at this school and wish to apply in connection with one of the faith criteria, you need to complete the SIF. If you do not complete the SIF and return it to the school with all supporting documents by the closing date, your child may not be placed in the appropriate faith criterion. This is likely to affect your child’s chance of being offered a place. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
St Oscar Romero Catholic School's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
736
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
992
134.8% of capacity
Over its capacity by
256
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
200
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that St Oscar Romero Catholic School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures St Oscar Romero Catholic School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
This school's admission rules have been challenged
Separately from appeals, anyone can object that a school's admission arrangements break the School Admissions Code. The Office of the Schools Adjudicator decides those objections and publishes a determination naming the school. St Oscar Romero Catholic School has been the subject of one such determination. The adjudicator did not find its arrangements at fault.
| Determined | Outcome | Determination |
|---|---|---|
| 23 January 2024 | No fault found | VAR2386 |
This is not a prediction about your appeal. An objection is about the rules the school admits by; an appeal is your case about your child. No school-level appeal figures are published for any school in England, and a determination does not create any. An upheld objection also requires the school to revise its arrangements, so a finding from an earlier year describes rules that had to change — what matters for your appeal is the arrangements for the year you applied under, and whether they were applied to you correctly.
When a mistake in the process is a ground for appeal →
Office of the Schools Adjudicator, published determinations.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Voluntary aided school
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- Faith
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- West Sussex
Postcode BN12 5AF. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 126096).
Other contested secondary schools in West Sussex
- St Wilfrid's Catholic Comprehensive School, Crawley 1.62 first choices per place
- St Paul's Catholic College 1.55 first choices per place
- Hazelwick School 1.40 first choices per place
- Bohunt Horsham 1.30 first choices per place
- St Philip Howard Catholic School 1.27 first choices per place
- Bishop Luffa School, Chichester 1.24 first choices per place
- Chichester Free School 1.19 first choices per place
- Tanbridge House School 1.16 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.