Refused a place at St Paul's Catholic College?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 78 families who named St Paul's Catholic College as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 210 and 267 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Surrey actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
267 first preferences for 210 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at St Paul's Catholic College
There is no published appeal success rate for St Paul's Catholic College, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Surrey as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Surrey, 21.2% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 215 of 1,016 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Surrey.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Surrey ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
St Paul's Catholic College turned first-choice families away in 11 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 8 of those years. In the other 3 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 179 | 128 | 98 | 0.72 |
| 2016/17 | 178 | 118 | 113 | 0.66 |
| 2017/18 | 180 | 177 | 113 | 0.98 |
| 2018/19 | 190 | 180 | 144 | 0.95 |
| 2019/20 | 187 | 273 | 149 | 1.46 |
| 2020/21 | 207 | 282 | 164 | 1.36 |
| 2021/22 | 212 | 249 | 164 | 1.17 |
| 2022/23 | 223 | 225 | 167 | 1.01 |
| 2023/24 | 228 | 276 | 201 | 1.21 |
| 2024/25 | 222 | 271 | 186 | 1.22 |
| 2025/26 | 210 | 280 | 190 | 1.33 |
| 2026/27 | 210 | 267 | 189 | 1.27 |
Places offered
210
in 2026/27
Named first choice
267
794 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
70.8%
189 of 267
Offers to families outside the council
43%
90 of 210 offers
This school was issued a new Department for Education reference when it converted to an academy. Its earlier years are included above, reported at the time under reference 125311.
How close you had to live
St Paul's Catholic College filled its places in 2024, and 6,278m — 3.90 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under criterion 5 , which is numbered in the school's own admission arrangements for that year.
Last place offered at
3.90 mi
6,278 metres, 2024
Under criterion
5
as numbered by the school
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Surrey Council, allocation statistics for 2024. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria St Paul's Catholic College published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Catholic looked after and previously looked after children. (see notes 2 & 3) |
| 2 | Catholic children with a Certificate of Catholic Practice who are resident in the parishes of St Lawrence’s Catholic Church Feltham, St Ignatius, Sunbury; St Michael’s, Ashford; Our Lady of the Rosary, Staines; St Francis De Sales, Hampton Hill; St Theodore’s of Canterbury, Hampton; St John Fisher, Shepperton; St Margaret of Scotland, St Margarets; The Sacred Heart. Teddington; St James’s, Twickenham; St Edmund of Canterbury, Whitton; St David’s Stanwell. (see notes 3, 4 & 12) |
| 3 | Other Catholic children with a Certificate of Catholic Practice. (see notes 3 & 4) |
| 4 | Other Catholic children. (see note 3) |
| 5 | Other looked after and previously looked after children. (see note 2) |
| 6 | Catechumens and members of an Eastern Christian Church. (see notes 5 & 6) |
| 7 | Children of Other Christian Denominations with a certificate of baptism, or where a minister or faith leader verifies by letter that the child is a member of the faith community. (see note 10) |
| 8 | Children of other Faiths where a faith leader verifies by letter that the child is a member of the faith community. (See note 11) |
| 9 | Any other children. Within each of the categories listed above, the following provisions will be applied in the following order. |
| (i) Where children have a parent who is a member of staff at St Paul’s Catholic College, and has been employed by Ascension Catholic Accademy Trust, for two or more years at the time at which the application for admission to the school (see note 8). (ii) Where evidence is provided at the time of application of an exceptional social, medical or pastoral need of the child which can most appropriately be met at this school, will increase the priority of an application within each category so that the application will be placed at the top of the category in which the application is made after children in (i) above (see note 9) (iii) The attendance of a brother or sister at the school at the time of […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
St Paul's Catholic College's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,050
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,096
104.4% of capacity
Over its capacity by
46
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
300
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that St Paul's Catholic College has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures St Paul's Catholic College was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
This school's admission rules have been challenged
Separately from appeals, anyone can object that a school's admission arrangements break the School Admissions Code. The Office of the Schools Adjudicator decides those objections and publishes a determination naming the school. St Paul's Catholic College has been the subject of one such determination. The adjudicator found its arrangements did not comply with the Code.
| Determined | Outcome | Determination |
|---|---|---|
| 2 November 2016 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA3141 |
This is not a prediction about your appeal. An objection is about the rules the school admits by; an appeal is your case about your child. No school-level appeal figures are published for any school in England, and a determination does not create any. An upheld objection also requires the school to revise its arrangements, so a finding from an earlier year describes rules that had to change — what matters for your appeal is the arrangements for the year you applied under, and whether they were applied to you correctly.
When a mistake in the process is a ground for appeal →
Office of the Schools Adjudicator, published determinations.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- Faith
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Surrey
Postcode TW16 6JE. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 149290).
Other contested secondary schools in Surrey
- Gordon's School 1.97 first choices per place
- St Andrew's Catholic School 1.60 first choices per place
- Cobham Free School 1.55 first choices per place
- Heathside Walton-on-Thames 1.52 first choices per place
- Hinchley Wood School 1.48 first choices per place
- St Bede's School 1.48 first choices per place
- St John the Baptist Catholic Comprehensive School, Woking 1.41 first choices per place
- All Hallows Catholic School 1.40 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.