Refused a place at Guiseley School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 25 families who named Guiseley School as their first choice did not get a place: 221 put it first and 196 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Leeds actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
221 first preferences for 227 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Guiseley School
There is no published appeal success rate for Guiseley School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Leeds as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Leeds, 17.1% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 288 of 1,685 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Leeds.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Leeds ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Guiseley School turned first-choice families away in 6 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 5 of those years. In the other 1 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 225 | 233 | 214 | 1.04 |
| 2016/17 | 239 | 263 | 223 | 1.1 |
| 2017/18 | 238 | 230 | 223 | 0.97 |
| 2018/19 | 238 | 208 | 205 | 0.87 |
| 2019/20 | 239 | 190 | 189 | 0.79 |
| 2020/21 | 237 | 188 | 188 | 0.79 |
| 2021/22 | 237 | 202 | 199 | 0.85 |
| 2022/23 | 237 | 217 | 212 | 0.92 |
| 2023/24 | 233 | 261 | 226 | 1.12 |
| 2024/25 | 232 | 264 | 220 | 1.14 |
| 2025/26 | 238 | 305 | 230 | 1.28 |
| 2026/27 | 227 | 221 | 196 | 0.97 |
Places offered
227
in 2026/27
Named first choice
221
868 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
88.7%
196 of 221
Offers to families outside the council
27%
61 of 227 offers
How close you had to live
Guiseley School filled its places in 2026, and 3,991m — 2.48 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under criterion 4 — Any other children, which is numbered in the school's own admission arrangements for that year.
Last place offered at
2.48 mi
3,991 metres, 2026
Under criterion
4
Any other children
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Leeds Council, allocation statistics for 2026. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,147
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,182
103.1% of capacity
Over its capacity by
35
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
240
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Guiseley School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Guiseley School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
This school's admission rules have been challenged
Separately from appeals, anyone can object that a school's admission arrangements break the School Admissions Code. The Office of the Schools Adjudicator decides those objections and publishes a determination naming the school. Guiseley School has been the subject of one such determination. The adjudicator found its arrangements did not comply with the Code.
| Determined | Outcome | Determination |
|---|---|---|
| 20 October 2021 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA3870 |
This is not a prediction about your appeal. An objection is about the rules the school admits by; an appeal is your case about your child. No school-level appeal figures are published for any school in England, and a determination does not create any. An upheld objection also requires the school to revise its arrangements, so a finding from an earlier year describes rules that had to change — what matters for your appeal is the arrangements for the year you applied under, and whether they were applied to you correctly.
When a mistake in the process is a ground for appeal →
Office of the Schools Adjudicator, published determinations.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Foundation school
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Leeds
Postcode LS20 8DT. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 108085).
Other contested secondary schools in Leeds
- Dixons Trinity Chapeltown 2.70 first choices per place
- Roundhay School 1.91 first choices per place
- The Ruth Gorse Academy 1.54 first choices per place
- Trinity Academy Leeds 1.48 first choices per place
- Carr Manor Community School 1.45 first choices per place
- Cardinal Heenan Catholic High School 1.39 first choices per place
- The Morley Academy 1.37 first choices per place
- Pudsey Grammar School 1.34 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.