Refused a place at Chipping Campden School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 46 families who named Chipping Campden School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 222 and 253 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Gloucestershire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
253 first preferences for 222 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Chipping Campden School
There is no published appeal success rate for Chipping Campden School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Gloucestershire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Gloucestershire, 26.5% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 424 of 1,598 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Gloucestershire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Gloucestershire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Chipping Campden School turned first-choice families away in 10 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 9 of those years. In the other 1 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 199 | 190 | 173 | 0.95 |
| 2016/17 | 193 | 212 | 173 | 1.1 |
| 2017/18 | 207 | 231 | 192 | 1.12 |
| 2018/19 | 203 | 242 | 189 | 1.19 |
| 2019/20 | 206 | 259 | 195 | 1.26 |
| 2020/21 | 220 | 245 | 210 | 1.11 |
| 2021/22 | 218 | 216 | 193 | 0.99 |
| 2022/23 | 212 | 211 | 204 | 1 |
| 2023/24 | 222 | 242 | 214 | 1.09 |
| 2024/25 | 213 | 301 | 202 | 1.41 |
| 2025/26 | 214 | 241 | 206 | 1.13 |
| 2026/27 | 222 | 253 | 207 | 1.14 |
Places offered
222
in 2026/27
Named first choice
253
382 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
81.8%
207 of 253
Offers to families outside the council
49%
108 of 222 offers
How close you had to live
Chipping Campden School filled its places in 2025, and 9,897m — 6.15 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under the distance criterion.
Last place offered at
6.15 mi
9,897 metres, 2025
Under criterion
Distance
as the council described it
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Gloucestershire Council, allocation statistics for 2025. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Chipping Campden School published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | A ‘looked after child’ (1) or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption (2) child arrangements order (residency order) (3) or special guardian ship order (4) including those who appear to the admission authority to have been in state care outside of England and cease to be in state care as a result of being adopted (5). (1) A ‘looked after child’ is a child who (a) is in the care of a local authority, or (b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions (see the definition in Section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989) at the time of making an application to a school. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 2 | Children living in the priority catchment area normally served by the school whose sibling is attending the school and who will continue to do so when the younger child is admitted. A sibling is defined as a brother or sister, half brother or sister, adopted brother or sister, step brother or sister or the child of the parent/carer’s partner as well as children who are brought together as a family by a same sex civil partnership. In every case, the child must be living in the same family unit at the same address, at the time of application. 3. Children for whom only this particular school is appropriate due to an exceptional medical condition. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 3 | Children living in the priority catchment area normally served by the school, with the strongest geographical claim, measured in a direct line (see 6 below). Please refer to the Transfer to Secondary School booklet for a description of the catchment area. |
| 4 | Children of full or part time salaried members of staff who have been employed at Chipping Campden School for 2 or more years at the time of which the application to admit to the school is made and/or of a member of staff recruited to fill a vacant post for which there is a demonstrable skill shortage. |
| 5 | Children who live outside the priority catchment area normally served by the school, whose sibling is attending the school and who will continue to do so when the younger child is admitted. |
| 6 | Children who live outside the priority catchment area normally served by the school, with the strongest geographical claim, measured in a direct line. See 8 below. |
| 7 | In the event of over subscription in any of the above criteria then the strongest geographical claim measured in a straight line from the ordnance survey point of the child’s home address to the right hand door of the school’s front entrance using the Local Authorities’ computerised measuring system, with those living closest to the school receiving the higher priority. |
| 8 | Over-subscription for those fulfilling the admissions criteria (i.e. sibling or living in catchment area): In the event of over-subscription, in any category, places will be awarded to those with the strongest geographical claim (as described in point 7) – this will be used as a tie-break. Where two or more applications are received from children living the same distance away for one final place, the school will make the final selection by lottery. |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Chipping Campden School's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,125
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,130
100.4% of capacity
Over its capacity by
5
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
350
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Chipping Campden School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Chipping Campden School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2011/12 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Gloucestershire
Postcode GL55 6HU. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136960).
Other contested secondary schools in Gloucestershire
- Pate's Grammar School 1.46 first choices per place
- The High School Leckhampton 1.45 first choices per place
- Thomas Keble School 1.33 first choices per place
- Balcarras School 1.32 first choices per place
- Stroud High School 1.32 first choices per place
- Denmark Road High School 1.29 first choices per place
- Sir Thomas Rich's School 1.29 first choices per place
- St Peter's Catholic High School and Sixth Form Centre 1.29 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.