School Admission Appeals

Refused a place at Thomas Keble School?

You are not alone. In 2026/27, 47 families who named Thomas Keble School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 123 and 164 put it first.

Below: what an appeal in Gloucestershire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.

1.33

first choices for every place available

164 first preferences for 123 places, 2026/27

Appealing a refusal at Thomas Keble School

There is no published appeal success rate for Thomas Keble School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Gloucestershire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.

Across Gloucestershire, 26.5% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 424 of 1,598 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.

A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.

See the full appeal figures for Gloucestershire.

What a panel here can act on

These are national rules, not Gloucestershire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.

How contested this school has been

Thomas Keble School turned first-choice families away in 10 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 9 of those years. In the other 1 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.

First preferences per place at Thomas Keble School, 2015/16 to 2026/27. A value above 1 means more families named the school first than there were places. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 one first preference per place 15/16 17/18 19/20 21/22 23/24 25/26 26/27 2015/16 1.04 per place 133 first choices 128 places 2016/17 0.96 per place 118 first choices 123 places 2017/18 1.25 per place 165 first choices 132 places 2018/19 0.93 per place 111 first choices 119 places 2019/20 1.2 per place 158 first choices 132 places 2020/21 1.15 per place 157 first choices 136 places 2021/22 0.95 per place 132 first choices 139 places 2022/23 1.13 per place 154 first choices 136 places 2023/24 1.09 per place 172 first choices 158 places 2024/25 1.21 per place 155 first choices 128 places 2025/26 1.4 per place 182 first choices 130 places 2026/27 1.33 per place 164 first choices 123 places
First preferences per place at Thomas Keble School. Years with too small an intake to carry a ratio are left blank rather than plotted. Latest year: 164 first preferences for 123 places.
View as a table
Places, first preferences and offers at Thomas Keble School, by year. A ratio is shown only where the intake is large enough to carry one.
Year Places First choices Offered Per place
2015/16 128 133 119 1.04
2016/17 123 118 118 0.96
2017/18 132 165 128 1.25
2018/19 119 111 111 0.93
2019/20 132 158 131 1.2
2020/21 136 157 125 1.15
2021/22 139 132 108 0.95
2022/23 136 154 129 1.13
2023/24 158 172 152 1.09
2024/25 128 155 125 1.21
2025/26 130 182 128 1.4
2026/27 123 164 117 1.33

Places offered

123

in 2026/27

Named first choice

164

337 named it at any preference

First choices offered a place

71.3%

117 of 164

Offers to families outside the council

0%

0 of 123 offers

How close you had to live

Thomas Keble School filled its places in 2025, and 3,219m — 2.00 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under the distance criterion.

Last place offered at

2.00 mi

3,219 metres, 2025

Under criterion

Distance

as the council described it

This is not a line you passed or failed

A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.

It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.

Gloucestershire Council, allocation statistics for 2025. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.

How places were ranked

These are the oversubscription criteria Thomas Keble School published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.

Oversubscription criteria for Thomas Keble School, 2027 entry, quoted from the school's determined admission arrangements. Sub-clauses are shown indented under the criterion they qualify.
Rank Criterion, as the school words it
1 Looked after children and children who were previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to adoption, a child arrangements order, or special guardianship order. In addition, children who appear [to the admission authority of the school] to have been in state care outside of England and ceased to be in state care as a result of being adopted.
2 Children living in the priority catchment area normally served by the school who will have siblings1 attending the school when the younger child is admitted and in every case, the child must be living in the same family unit at the same address.
3 Children who have an authenticated medical reason2 for attending that particular school.
4 Children living in the priority catchment area normally served by the school with the strongest geographical claim, measured in a direct line.
5 Children who live outside the priority catchment area normally served by the school who will have siblings attending the school when the younger child is admitted.
6 Children who live outside the priority catchment area normally served by the school with the strongest geographical claim, measured in a direct line (please see note c) below).

The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.

Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal

A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.

So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.

These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.

Thomas Keble School's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.

Was the school full?

This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.

Places, Years 7 to 11

710

2024/25, whole school

Pupils in them

722

101.7% of capacity

Over its capacity by

12

reported as full or beyond

Sixth form places

0

excluded from the figures above

Read this before you use these numbers

These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Thomas Keble School has room for your child.

They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.

On the published figures Thomas Keble School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.

Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2011/12 to 2024/25

Places Pupils on roll

Places and pupils on roll at Thomas Keble School from 2011/12 to 2024/25. Where the roll meets the places line, the school is full. 0 400 800 places on roll 11/12 13/14 15/16 17/18 20/21 22/23 24/25 2011/12 680 places 683 on roll 2012/13 680 places 689 on roll 2013/14 680 places 675 on roll 2014/15 680 places 674 on roll 2015/16 680 places 670 on roll 2016/17 680 places 664 on roll 2017/18 680 places 668 on roll 2018/19 680 places 663 on roll 2020/21 710 places 676 on roll 2021/22 710 places 685 on roll 2022/23 710 places 665 on roll 2023/24 710 places 705 on roll 2024/25 710 places 722 on roll
Whole-school figures including any sixth form, as at 1 May each year. 2019/20 is missing because the 2020 School Capacity survey was cancelled.

Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.

What these figures do not tell you

About the school

Type
Academy converter
Admissions policy
Non-selective
Religious character
No religious character
Entry point
Year 7
Council
Gloucestershire

Postcode GL6 7DY. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 137059).

Other contested secondary schools in Gloucestershire

Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.