Refused a place at Rugby High School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 110 families who named Rugby High School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 150 and 249 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Warwickshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
249 first preferences for 150 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Rugby High School
There is no published appeal success rate for Rugby High School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Warwickshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Warwickshire, 20.1% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 192 of 957 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Warwickshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Warwickshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Rugby High School turned first-choice families away in every one of the 12 years published. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 123 | 210 | 113 | 1.71 |
| 2016/17 | 121 | 243 | 115 | 2.01 |
| 2017/18 | 118 | 223 | 116 | 1.89 |
| 2018/19 | 121 | 209 | 113 | 1.73 |
| 2019/20 | 117 | 216 | 111 | 1.85 |
| 2020/21 | 120 | 247 | 117 | 2.06 |
| 2021/22 | 120 | 285 | 115 | 2.38 |
| 2022/23 | 116 | 224 | 114 | 1.93 |
| 2023/24 | 121 | 262 | 113 | 2.17 |
| 2024/25 | 120 | 274 | 112 | 2.28 |
| 2025/26 | 120 | 265 | 110 | 2.21 |
| 2026/27 | 150 | 249 | 139 | 1.66 |
Places offered
150
in 2026/27
Named first choice
249
405 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
55.8%
139 of 249
Offers to families outside the council
18%
27 of 150 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Rugby High School published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | – Looked after children and previously looked after children who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry, or between one and twenty marks below the Automatic Qualifying Score, or who achieve the required minimum academic standard for admission (minimum score for a place on the waiting list), whichever is the lower. [A looked after child is a child who is (a) in the care of a local authority, or (b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions (see the definition in Section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989) at the time of making an application to a school. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 2 | – Up to 30 places will be allocated to children who were eligible for the Pupil Premium6 at the point of registering to sit the entrance test living in the Eastern Area of Warwickshire or the Priority Circle, who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry, or whose scores are between one and twenty marks below the Automatic Qualifying Score for this school for this particular year of entry, or who achieve the required minimum academic standard for admission (minimum score for a place on the waiting list), whichever is the lower (including any re-offers which are made from the waiting list in this criterion after 1 March 2027, provided […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 3 | – Up to 5 places will be allocated to children who were eligible for the Service Premium7 at the point of registering to sit the entrance test living in the Eastern Area of Warwickshire or the Priority Circle, who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry, or whose scores are between one and twenty marks below the Automatic Qualifying Score for this school, for this particular year of entry, or who achieve the required minimum academic standard for admission (minimum score for a place on the waiting list), whichever is the lower (including any re-offers which are made from the waiting list in this criterion An Education, Health and […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 4 | – Children of staff who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry where the member of staff has been employed at the school for two or more years at the time at which the application for admission to the school is made. This will apply to all teaching and non-teaching staff on permanent contracts but excludes casual/temporary appointments (eg invigilators and peripatetic staff). […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 5 | – Children living in the Eastern Area of Warwickshire who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry. |
| 6 | – Children living in the Priority Circle who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry. |
| 7 | – If the PAN has not been reached and fewer than 30 places were offered under Criterion 2, then the balance of those 30 places will be offered to students who were eligible for the Pupil Premium (as previously defined) at the point of registering to sit the entrance test living outside the catchment areas who achieve the Automatic Qualifying Score or above for this school for this particular year of entry, or whose scores are between one and twenty marks below the Automatic Qualifying Score for this school for this particular year of entry, or who achieve the required minimum academic standa |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Rugby High School's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
600
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
599
99.8% of capacity
Unfilled places
1
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
300
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Rugby High School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Rugby High School reported 1 unfilled place across Years 7 to 11, at 99.8% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2010/11 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
This school's admission rules have been challenged
Separately from appeals, anyone can object that a school's admission arrangements break the School Admissions Code. The Office of the Schools Adjudicator decides those objections and publishes a determination naming the school. Rugby High School has been the subject of 5 such determinations. The adjudicator found its arrangements did not comply with the Code in each of them.
| Determined | Outcome | Determination |
|---|---|---|
| 24 November 2021 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA3812 |
| 3 July 2019 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA3502 |
| 12 December 2018 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA3351 |
| 15 September 2015 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA2877 |
| 12 June 2014 | Arrangements did not comply | ADA2609 |
This is not a prediction about your appeal. An objection is about the rules the school admits by; an appeal is your case about your child. No school-level appeal figures are published for any school in England, and a determination does not create any. An upheld objection also requires the school to revise its arrangements, so a finding from an earlier year describes rules that had to change — what matters for your appeal is the arrangements for the year you applied under, and whether they were applied to you correctly.
When a mistake in the process is a ground for appeal →
Office of the Schools Adjudicator, published determinations.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Warwickshire does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Warwickshire
Postcode CV22 7RE. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136595).
Other contested secondary schools in Warwickshire
- King Edward VI School 2.54 first choices per place
- Stratford Girls' Grammar School 2.41 first choices per place
- Lawrence Sheriff School 2.13 first choices per place
- Alcester Grammar School 1.97 first choices per place
- Rugby Free Secondary School 1.39 first choices per place
- St Thomas More Catholic Academy and Sixth Form College 1.29 first choices per place
- Kenilworth School and Sixth Form 1.21 first choices per place
- Southam College 1.16 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.