Refused a place at Sir Graham Balfour High School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 10 families who named Sir Graham Balfour High School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 185 and 186 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Staffordshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
186 first preferences for 185 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Sir Graham Balfour High School
There is no published appeal success rate for Sir Graham Balfour High School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Staffordshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Staffordshire, 20.9% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 157 of 752 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Staffordshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Staffordshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Sir Graham Balfour High School turned first-choice families away in 8 of the last 12 years. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 177 | 171 | 171 | 0.97 |
| 2016/17 | 169 | 167 | 163 | 0.99 |
| 2017/18 | 185 | 184 | 180 | 0.99 |
| 2018/19 | 178 | 227 | 170 | 1.28 |
| 2019/20 | 197 | 228 | 196 | 1.16 |
| 2020/21 | 178 | 197 | 174 | 1.11 |
| 2021/22 | 170 | 161 | 161 | 0.95 |
| 2022/23 | 199 | 205 | 198 | 1.03 |
| 2023/24 | 195 | 206 | 193 | 1.06 |
| 2024/25 | 205 | 224 | 204 | 1.09 |
| 2025/26 | 194 | 212 | 182 | 1.09 |
| 2026/27 | 185 | 186 | 176 | 1.01 |
Places offered
185
in 2026/27
Named first choice
186
340 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
94.6%
176 of 186
Offers to families outside the council
0%
0 of 185 offers
This school was issued a new Department for Education reference when it converted to an academy. Its earlier years are included above, reported at the time under reference 124444.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Sir Graham Balfour High School published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Children in care and children who ceased to be in care because they were adopted (or became subject to a child arrangements order or special guardianship order), including those children who appear (to the admission authority) to have been in state care outside of England and ceased to be in state care as a result of being adopted. see additional note * below |
| 2 | Children who satisfy both of the following tests: Test 1: the child is distinguished from the great majority of applicants either on their own medical grounds or by other exceptional circumstances. Medical grounds must be supported by a medical report (obtained by the applicant and provided at the point of application). This report must clearly justify, for health reasons only, why it is better for the child’s health to attend the preferred school rather than any other school. Exceptional circumstances must relate to the choice of school and the individual child, i.e. the circumstances of the child, not the economic or social circumstances of the parent/carer. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Sir Graham Balfour High School's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
922
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
935
101.4% of capacity
Over its capacity by
13
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
120
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Sir Graham Balfour High School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Sir Graham Balfour High School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Staffordshire does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Staffordshire
Postcode ST16 1NR. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 142983).
Other contested secondary schools in Staffordshire
- Blessed Robert Sutton Catholic Voluntary Academy 1.54 first choices per place
- Landau Forte Academy, QEMS 1.33 first choices per place
- The Friary School 1.24 first choices per place
- Madeley High School 1.14 first choices per place
- Blessed William Howard Catholic School 1.13 first choices per place
- Kingsmead School 1.12 first choices per place
- Rugeley John Taylor 1.12 first choices per place
- Chesterton Community Sports College 1.11 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.