Refused a place at Great Wyrley Academy?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 6 families who named Great Wyrley Academy as their first choice did not get a place: 129 put it first and 123 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Staffordshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 8 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
129 first preferences for 148 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Great Wyrley Academy
There is no published appeal success rate for Great Wyrley Academy, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Staffordshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Staffordshire, 20.9% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 157 of 752 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Staffordshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Staffordshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Great Wyrley Academy turned first-choice families away in 1 of the last 8 years. It has never had more first choices than places, and refused families who named it first anyway — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/20 | 93 | 62 | 62 | 0.67 |
| 2020/21 | 84 | 67 | 66 | 0.8 |
| 2021/22 | 87 | 60 | 60 | 0.69 |
| 2022/23 | 117 | 109 | 109 | 0.93 |
| 2023/24 | 115 | 99 | 99 | 0.86 |
| 2024/25 | 116 | 103 | 92 | 0.89 |
| 2025/26 | 144 | 127 | 123 | 0.88 |
| 2026/27 | 148 | 129 | 123 | 0.87 |
Places offered
148
in 2026/27
Named first choice
129
344 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
95.3%
123 of 129
Offers to families outside the council
30%
45 of 148 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Great Wyrley Academy published for 2025 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Children in Care and children who ceased to be in care because they were adopted (or became subject to a residence order or special guardianship order) including those children who appear (to the admission authority) to have been in state care outside of England and ceased to be in state care as a result of being adopted. See additional note * below. |
| 2 | Children who satisfy both of the following tests: Test 1: the child is distinguished from the great majority of applicants either on their own medical grounds or by other exceptional circumstances. Medical grounds must be supported by a medical report (obtained by the applicant and provided at the point of application). This report must clearly justify, for health reasons only, why it is better for the child’s health to attend the Academy rather than any other school. Exceptional circumstances must relate to the choice of school and the individual child, i.e. the circumstances of the child, not the economic or social circumstances of the parent/carer. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 3 | Children who have an elder sibling in attendance at the Academy and who will still be attending the school at the proposed admission date; (For the application to be prioritised under this criteria the children must be living at the same home address for the majority of the school week and either: have one or both natural parents in common; are related by a parents marriage; are adopted or fostered by a common parent or are unrelated children who live at the same address, whose parents live as partners.) |
| 4 | Children living within the catchment area. see additional notes ** below |
| 5 | Children who attend our major contributory schools, Cheslyn Hay, Glenthorne, St John’s, Featherstone and Havergal. |
| 6 | Other children arranged in order of priority according to how near their home addresses are to the main gate of the Academy, determined by a straight-line measurement as calculated by the Local Authority’s Geographical Information System. see additional note *** below Where it is not possible to accommodate all children applying for places within a particular category then the Academy will allocate the available places in accordance with the remaining criteria. If for instance, all the catchment area children cannot be accommodated at an Academy, children who are resident within the catchment area will be arranged in order of priority according to distance i.e. category (6). […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2025 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Great Wyrley Academy's determined admission arrangements for 2025 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
881
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
543
61.6% of capacity
Unfilled places
338
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
200
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Great Wyrley Academy has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Great Wyrley Academy reported 338 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 61.6% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2018/19 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Staffordshire does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy sponsor led
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Staffordshire
Postcode WS6 6LQ. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 144988).
Other contested secondary schools in Staffordshire
- Blessed Robert Sutton Catholic Voluntary Academy 1.54 first choices per place
- Landau Forte Academy, QEMS 1.33 first choices per place
- The Friary School 1.24 first choices per place
- Madeley High School 1.14 first choices per place
- Blessed William Howard Catholic School 1.13 first choices per place
- Kingsmead School 1.12 first choices per place
- Rugeley John Taylor 1.12 first choices per place
- Chesterton Community Sports College 1.11 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.