Refused a place at John Henry Newman Catholic College?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 58 families who named John Henry Newman Catholic College as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 235 and 269 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Solihull actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
269 first preferences for 235 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at John Henry Newman Catholic College
There is no published appeal success rate for John Henry Newman Catholic College, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Solihull as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Solihull, 2.8% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 18 of 648 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Solihull.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Solihull ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
John Henry Newman Catholic College turned first-choice families away in every one of the 12 years published. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 236 | 323 | 212 | 1.37 |
| 2016/17 | 236 | 277 | 198 | 1.17 |
| 2017/18 | 240 | 305 | 218 | 1.27 |
| 2018/19 | 238 | 361 | 226 | 1.52 |
| 2019/20 | 236 | 280 | 210 | 1.19 |
| 2020/21 | 239 | 288 | 223 | 1.21 |
| 2021/22 | 237 | 269 | 220 | 1.14 |
| 2022/23 | 236 | 269 | 208 | 1.14 |
| 2023/24 | 238 | 334 | 230 | 1.4 |
| 2024/25 | 237 | 333 | 227 | 1.41 |
| 2025/26 | 234 | 284 | 215 | 1.21 |
| 2026/27 | 235 | 269 | 211 | 1.14 |
Places offered
235
in 2026/27
Named first choice
269
758 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
78.4%
211 of 269
Offers to families outside the council
60%
141 of 235 offers
How close you had to live
John Henry Newman Catholic College filled its places in 2025, and 3,895m — 2.42 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under the non catholic in a named feeder criterion.
Last place offered at
2.42 mi
3,895 metres, 2025
Under criterion
Non Catholic in a named feeder
as the council described it
Range across years with a cut-off
1.32–2.42 mi
3 years, 2023 to 2025
| Year | Distance | Criterion the last place went under |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.42 miles (3,895m) | Non Catholic in a named feeder |
| 2024 | 1.32 miles (2,124m) | Non Catholic in a named feeder |
| 2023 | 1.86 miles (2,993m) | Non Catholic in a named feeder |
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also moves a great deal. Across the years published here it has ranged from 1.32 to 2.42 miles — a 1.8-fold spread — because it is set by who happened to apply that year, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Solihull Council, allocation statistics for 2023–2025. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,200
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,173
97.8% of capacity
Unfilled places
27
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
200
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that John Henry Newman Catholic College has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures John Henry Newman Catholic College reported 27 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 97.8% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2010/11 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy sponsor led
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- Faith
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Solihull
Postcode B37 5GA. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136347).
Other contested secondary schools in Solihull
- Grace Academy Solihull 1.41 first choices per place
- Tudor Grange Academy, Solihull 1.36 first choices per place
- Langley School 1.21 first choices per place
- St Peter's Catholic School 1.20 first choices per place
- Park Hall Academy 1.12 first choices per place
- Alderbrook School 1.08 first choices per place
- Light Hall School 1.02 first choices per place
- Arden 0.97 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.