Refused a place at North Chadderton School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 51 families who named North Chadderton School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 262 and 288 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Oldham actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
288 first preferences for 262 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at North Chadderton School
There is no published appeal success rate for North Chadderton School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Oldham as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Oldham, 10% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 74 of 740 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Oldham.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Oldham ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
North Chadderton School turned first-choice families away in 11 of the last 12 years. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 230 | 351 | 219 | 1.53 |
| 2016/17 | 234 | 339 | 229 | 1.45 |
| 2017/18 | 267 | 315 | 236 | 1.18 |
| 2018/19 | 267 | 337 | 254 | 1.26 |
| 2019/20 | 266 | 311 | 255 | 1.17 |
| 2020/21 | 266 | 283 | 243 | 1.06 |
| 2021/22 | 268 | 330 | 250 | 1.23 |
| 2022/23 | 266 | 301 | 246 | 1.13 |
| 2023/24 | 265 | 289 | 246 | 1.09 |
| 2024/25 | 266 | 308 | 255 | 1.16 |
| 2025/26 | 262 | 220 | 217 | 0.84 |
| 2026/27 | 262 | 288 | 237 | 1.1 |
Places offered
262
in 2026/27
Named first choice
288
779 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
82.3%
237 of 288
Offers to families outside the council
0%
1 of 262 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria North Chadderton School published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Children who are in public care or children who have previously been looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, residence, or special guardianship order. |
| 2 | Those children who are considered to have an exceptional medical or social reason as to why they should attend a particular school (Parents/carers will need to submit a case supported by appropriate professional evidence from a doctor, social worker or similar professional that sets out the particular reasons why this school is the most suitable and the difficulties that could be caused if the child were to attend another school. The evidence must not be more than six months older than the application date). Criterion 2 Children living within the prescribed geographical priority area who have a sibling attending the school in Year 7 to 13 when the child is admitted. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
North Chadderton School's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,345
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,350
100.4% of capacity
Over its capacity by
5
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
300
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that North Chadderton School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures North Chadderton School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2014/15 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Oldham does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Oldham
Postcode OL9 0BN. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 141248).
Other contested secondary schools in Oldham
- The Blue Coat CofE School 2.63 first choices per place
- The Brian Clarke Church of England Academy 2.04 first choices per place
- The Crompton House Church of England Academy 1.12 first choices per place
- The Hathershaw College 0.83 first choices per place
- Saint John Henry Newman Roman Catholic College, A Voluntary Academy 0.70 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.