Refused a place at Fernwood School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 140 families who named Fernwood School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 293 and 426 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Nottingham actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
426 first preferences for 293 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Fernwood School
There is no published appeal success rate for Fernwood School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Nottingham as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Nottingham, 19.7% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 226 of 1,149 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Nottingham.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Nottingham ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Fernwood School turned first-choice families away in 10 of the last 12 years. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 200 | 288 | 199 | 1.44 |
| 2016/17 | 200 | 251 | 198 | 1.25 |
| 2017/18 | 209 | 296 | 207 | 1.42 |
| 2018/19 | 210 | 271 | 207 | 1.29 |
| 2019/20 | 210 | 270 | 208 | 1.29 |
| 2020/21 | 300 | 234 | 231 | 0.78 |
| 2021/22 | 297 | 272 | 252 | 0.92 |
| 2022/23 | 297 | 304 | 280 | 1.02 |
| 2023/24 | 303 | 305 | 276 | 1.01 |
| 2024/25 | 298 | 358 | 286 | 1.2 |
| 2025/26 | 278 | 320 | 271 | 1.15 |
| 2026/27 | 293 | 426 | 286 | 1.45 |
Places offered
293
in 2026/27
Named first choice
426
796 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
67.1%
286 of 426
Offers to families outside the council
2%
7 of 293 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Fernwood School published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Places will first be allocated to a “Looked After Child” or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, child arrangements, or special guardianship order. A Looked After Child is a child who is (a) in the care of the local authority, or (b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions in accordance with section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989 at the time of making an application to a school. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 2 | Places will then be allocated to other pupils who, at the closing date for applications, live within the catchment area and have a sibling already attending the school whom is expected still to be on roll on the proposed date of admission of the applicant pupil. |
| 3 | Places will then be allocated to other pupils who, at the closing date for applications, live within the catchment area. |
| 4 | Places will then be allocated to other pupils who live outside the catchment area who, at the closing date for applications, attend one of the designated feeder schools, and have a sibling already attending the school (i.e. The Fernwood School) and whom is expected still to be on roll on the proposed date of admission of the applicant pupil. |
| 5 | Places will then be allocated to other pupils who live outside the catchment area who, at the closing date for applications attend one of the designated feeder schools. |
| 6 | Places will then be offered to children of staff at the school in either or both of the following circumstances:- |
| a) where the member of staff has been employed at the Academy for two or more years at the time at which the application for admission to the school is made, and/or | |
| b) the member of staff is recruited to fill a vacant post for which there is a demonstrable skills shortage. | |
| 7 | Places will then be allocated to other pupils who live outside the catchment area, who, at the closing date for applications, have a sibling already attending the school whom is expected still to be on roll on the proposed date of admission of the applicant pupil. |
| 8 | Places will then be allocated to other pupils who live outside the catchment area. Exceptional Circumstances The above criteria (2-8) may be overridden and priority given to an applicant for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a specific medical or social need that makes it essential that they attend The Fernwood School rather than any other school. Each case will be considered on its merits by the Governors who will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this criterion. The evidence must relate specifically to The Fernwood School and must clearly demonstrate why Fernwood is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| • Specific professional evidence from a registered health professional such as a doctor that justifies why only The Fernwood School can meet the child’s individual medical needs, and/or | |
| • Specific professional evidence from a local authority social worker that outlines exceptional family circumstances that justifies why only The Fernwood School can meet the child’s individual social needs; and | |
| • If The Fernwood School is not the nearest school to the child’s home address clear reasons why the nearest school is not appropriate |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Fernwood School's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,500
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,538
102.5% of capacity
Over its capacity by
38
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
0
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Fernwood School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Fernwood School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2010/11 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Nottingham does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Nottingham
Postcode NG8 2FT. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136724).
Other contested secondary schools in Nottingham
- Nottingham University Academy of Science and Technology 1.62 first choices per place
- Nottingham Free School 1.54 first choices per place
- Bluecoat Aspley Academy 1.47 first choices per place
- Bluecoat Trent Academy 1.21 first choices per place
- The Trinity Catholic School A Voluntary Academy 1.12 first choices per place
- Bluecoat Wollaton Academy 1.11 first choices per place
- Park Vale Academy 0.90 first choices per place
- The Oakwood Academy 0.90 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.