Refused a place at Caistor Grammar School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 29 families who named Caistor Grammar School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 113 and 142 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Lincolnshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
142 first preferences for 113 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Caistor Grammar School
There is no published appeal success rate for Caistor Grammar School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Lincolnshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Lincolnshire, 40.3% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 778 of 1,930 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Lincolnshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Lincolnshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Caistor Grammar School turned first-choice families away in every one of the 12 years published. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 94 | 110 | 92 | 1.17 |
| 2016/17 | 98 | 124 | 98 | 1.27 |
| 2017/18 | 100 | 126 | 99 | 1.26 |
| 2018/19 | 100 | 122 | 100 | 1.22 |
| 2019/20 | 100 | 137 | 100 | 1.37 |
| 2020/21 | 99 | 125 | 98 | 1.26 |
| 2021/22 | 99 | 133 | 98 | 1.34 |
| 2022/23 | 99 | 116 | 98 | 1.17 |
| 2023/24 | 97 | 123 | 97 | 1.27 |
| 2024/25 | 96 | 129 | 96 | 1.34 |
| 2025/26 | 96 | 134 | 96 | 1.4 |
| 2026/27 | 113 | 142 | 113 | 1.26 |
Places offered
113
in 2026/27
Named first choice
142
184 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
79.6%
113 of 142
Offers to families outside the council
64%
72 of 113 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Caistor Grammar School published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | After EHCP students and Looked After Children, the next students to be admitted are those who qualify and are in-catchment. In-catchment candidates are those whose principal residency is within 6.5 miles in a straight line distance from the Post Office Address of the School to that of the applicant’s principle residence. Lincolnshire County Council School Admissions Team will use the Post Office address for the applicant’s principle residence. The final decision of the straight line distance is made by Lincolnshire County Council School Admissions Team, calculated electronically to three figures after the decimal point (e.g. 1.543 miles). […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 2 | In the main admissions round for entry into Year 7, up to 12 places will be reserved for students who are in receipt of Pupil Premium (Ever 6). Aside from those Pupil Premium (Ever 6) students who have already been allocated places by virtue of being in-catchment, out-of-catchment students who are currently in receipt of Pupil Premium (Ever 6) will make up the remainder of these places, based on the highest V.R. scores (see section 5.4 below). […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 3 | Priority between children who do not fall into the above categories (5.1, 5.2 and 5.21) will go to the applicants with the higher V.R. scores. |
| 4 | In the case of over subscription in either category 5.1, 5.2, 5.21 or 5.3, we would take the highest V.R. scores. In the event of a tie, the following criteria shall apply: we shall calculate the mean rank position and, if there is still a tie, we shall take the highest individual score on the written test. If a tie still exists, we take the least number of mistakes made on the written paper, then the raw mark on the written paper and finally the raw mark overall. If there is still a tie between two students, then the School would admit both candidates. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 5 | The date of determining whether a pupil qualifies as an in-catchment applicant on the basis of residence will be 1st September of the year preceding entry. For in-catchment status to be retained, we expect residence to be continuous in catchment after this date whilst they remain in School, up until the end of Year 11. Parents should write straight away to the Headteacher, explaining their reason(s) for moving out of catchment to enable them to make a recommendation to the Admissions Panel concerning status. The parents of candidates claiming in-catchment status will be asked to provide evidence in support of their claim for in-catchment status. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 6 | Caistor Grammar School reserves the right to check any address and other information provided so we can apply the oversubscription criteria accurately and fairly. As an Admissions Authority we have the right to investigate any concerns we may have about an application and to withdraw the offer of a place if we consider the evidence is fraudulent or if misleading information is provided, for example if a false address was given which denied a place to a child with a stronger claim. If a place is withdrawn, the application will be considered afresh and parents will be advised of their right to appeal if a place is refused. |
| 7 | Any successful candidate claiming in-catchment status after 1st September of the year preceding entry will be placed on the in-catchment section of the waiting list a year from when they began residing in-catchment (as defined in Section 5.3 above). We wish to give priority to our local children, who have a reasonable expectation of going to a Grammar School, therefore we expect a full year of in-catchment residency. However the Board of Trustees will revi |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Caistor Grammar School's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
459
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
503
109.6% of capacity
Over its capacity by
44
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
170
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Caistor Grammar School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Caistor Grammar School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2010/11 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Lincolnshire does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Lincolnshire
Postcode LN7 6QJ. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136350).
Other contested secondary schools in Lincolnshire
- The Priory Academy LSST 1.89 first choices per place
- Skegness Grammar School 1.82 first choices per place
- The King's School, Grantham 1.64 first choices per place
- Kesteven and Grantham Girls' School 1.49 first choices per place
- Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School, Horncastle 1.42 first choices per place
- Spalding High School 1.36 first choices per place
- Boston High School 1.33 first choices per place
- Bourne Grammar School 1.26 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.