Refused a place at Maidstone Grammar School for Girls?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 29 families who named Maidstone Grammar School for Girls as their first choice did not get a place: 132 put it first and 103 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Kent actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
132 first preferences for 133 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Maidstone Grammar School for Girls
There is no published appeal success rate for Maidstone Grammar School for Girls, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Kent as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Kent, 27.6% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 1,757 of 6,368 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Kent.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Kent ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Maidstone Grammar School for Girls turned first-choice families away in every one of the 12 years published. More families named it first than it had places in 10 of those years. In the other 2 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 167 | 174 | 137 | 1.04 |
| 2016/17 | 146 | 159 | 123 | 1.09 |
| 2017/18 | 138 | 136 | 116 | 0.99 |
| 2018/19 | 149 | 168 | 134 | 1.13 |
| 2019/20 | 122 | 136 | 109 | 1.11 |
| 2020/21 | 123 | 131 | 109 | 1.07 |
| 2021/22 | 152 | 211 | 113 | 1.39 |
| 2022/23 | 133 | 139 | 111 | 1.05 |
| 2023/24 | 154 | 175 | 135 | 1.14 |
| 2024/25 | 166 | 175 | 141 | 1.05 |
| 2025/26 | 131 | 142 | 117 | 1.08 |
| 2026/27 | 133 | 132 | 103 | 0.99 |
Places offered
133
in 2026/27
Named first choice
132
699 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
78%
103 of 132
Offers to families outside the council
18%
24 of 132 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Maidstone Grammar School for Girls published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Eligible girls who are looked after and previously looked after children: A looked after child or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became subject to an adoption, child arrangements, or special guardianship order. A looked after child is a child who is: (a) in the care of a local authority, or (b) being provided with accommodation by a local authority in the exercise of their social services functions (see the definition in Section 22(1) of the Children Act 1989). Children previously in Care outside of England - Children who appear to have been in state care outside of England and ceased to be in state care as a result of being adopted. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 2 | Students in receipt of Pupil Premium: A student is eligible for Pupil Premium where they have been registered for free school meals (FSM) at any point in the last 6 years. This does not include students who have only been eligible to receive Universal Infant Free School Meals. Parents wishing to apply under this criterion must ensure that they complete the attached |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Maidstone Grammar School for Girls's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,002
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
917
91.5% of capacity
Unfilled places
85
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
460
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Maidstone Grammar School for Girls has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Maidstone Grammar School for Girls reported 85 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 91.5% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Kent does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Foundation school
- Admissions policy
- Selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Kent
Postcode ME16 0SF. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 118836).
Other contested secondary schools in Kent
- Dartford Grammar School 3.18 first choices per place
- Dartford Grammar School for Girls 2.40 first choices per place
- The Judd School 2.23 first choices per place
- Tonbridge Grammar School 1.96 first choices per place
- St John's Catholic Comprehensive 1.77 first choices per place
- The Malling School 1.65 first choices per place
- School of Science and Technology Maidstone 1.63 first choices per place
- Cranbrook School 1.62 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.