Refused a place at Kings Langley School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 16 families who named Kings Langley School as their first choice did not get a place: 155 put it first and 139 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Hertfordshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
155 first preferences for 180 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Kings Langley School
There is no published appeal success rate for Kings Langley School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Hertfordshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Hertfordshire, 21% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 314 of 1,496 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Hertfordshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Hertfordshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Kings Langley School turned first-choice families away in 11 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 2 of those years. In the other 9 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 186 | 175 | 149 | 0.94 |
| 2016/17 | 185 | 185 | 154 | 1 |
| 2017/18 | 185 | 173 | 143 | 0.94 |
| 2018/19 | 186 | 172 | 149 | 0.92 |
| 2019/20 | 186 | 181 | 135 | 0.97 |
| 2020/21 | 189 | 149 | 142 | 0.79 |
| 2021/22 | 188 | 154 | 131 | 0.82 |
| 2022/23 | 209 | 199 | 166 | 0.95 |
| 2023/24 | 183 | 202 | 143 | 1.1 |
| 2024/25 | 184 | 182 | 143 | 0.99 |
| 2025/26 | 183 | 192 | 145 | 1.05 |
| 2026/27 | 180 | 155 | 139 | 0.86 |
Places offered
180
in 2026/27
Named first choice
155
592 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
89.7%
139 of 155
Offers to families outside the council
0%
0 of 180 offers
How close you had to live
Kings Langley School filled its places in 2026, and 3,579m — 2.22 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under the in priority area, distance criterion.
Last place offered at
2.22 mi
3,579 metres, 2026
Under criterion
In Priority Area, Distance
as the council described it
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Hertfordshire Council, allocation statistics for 2026. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Kings Langley School published for 2027 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, including those who appear (to the admission authority) to have been in state care outside of England, and ceased to be in state care as a result of being adopted or became subject to a child arrangements order¹ or a special guardianship order². |
| 2 | Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school. A panel of HCC officers will decide the outcome of Rule 2 applications. |
| 3 | Children with a parent who is a permanent full-time or part-time member of the school staff (inclusive of teaching and support staff roles). |
| 4 | Sibling: Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school. Note: the ‘normal age range’ for Kings Langley School means Years 7 to 13. |
| 5 | Children who live in the priority area 6b for whom it is their nearest Hertfordshire maintained school or academy that is non-faith, co-educational and non-partially selective school in the priority area. Note: Non-partially selective means that the school does not offer any places based on academic ability. |
| 6 | Children who live in the priority area (6a and 6b) who live nearest to the school. |
| 7 | Children living outside the priority area on the basis of distance, with those living nearest to the school given priority. These rules are applied in the order they are printed above. If more children qualify under a particular rule than there are places available, a tiebreak will be used by applying the next rule to those children. Where there is a need for a tie-breaker where two different addresses measure the same distance from a school, in the case of a block of flats for example the lower door number will be deemed nearest as logically this will be on the ground floor and therefore closer. If there are two identical addresses of separate applicants, the tie break will be random. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2027 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Kings Langley School's determined admission arrangements for 2027 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
930
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
935
100.5% of capacity
Over its capacity by
5
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
250
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Kings Langley School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Kings Langley School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2012/13 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Hertfordshire
Postcode WD4 9HN. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 139036).
Other contested secondary schools in Hertfordshire
- Hockerill Anglo-European College 2.49 first choices per place
- Parmiter's School 2.37 first choices per place
- Watford Grammar School for Boys 1.88 first choices per place
- Dame Alice Owen's School 1.78 first choices per place
- Watford Grammar School for Girls 1.77 first choices per place
- Queens' School 1.68 first choices per place
- The Bishop's Stortford High School 1.61 first choices per place
- The Broxbourne School 1.61 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.