Refused a place at Goffs - Churchgate Academy?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 12 families who named Goffs - Churchgate Academy as their first choice did not get a place: 91 put it first and 79 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Hertfordshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
91 first preferences for 110 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Goffs - Churchgate Academy
There is no published appeal success rate for Goffs - Churchgate Academy, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Hertfordshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Hertfordshire, 21% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 314 of 1,496 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Hertfordshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Hertfordshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Goffs - Churchgate Academy turned first-choice families away in 8 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 5 of those years. In the other 3 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 61 | 45 | 45 | 0.74 |
| 2016/17 | 37 | 29 | 28 | 0.78 |
| 2017/18 | 69 | 36 | 36 | 0.52 |
| 2018/19 | 116 | 68 | 68 | 0.59 |
| 2019/20 | 119 | 100 | 72 | 0.84 |
| 2020/21 | 118 | 126 | 88 | 1.07 |
| 2021/22 | 108 | 103 | 61 | 0.95 |
| 2022/23 | 118 | 141 | 90 | 1.19 |
| 2023/24 | 103 | 162 | 83 | 1.57 |
| 2024/25 | 112 | 138 | 91 | 1.23 |
| 2025/26 | 112 | 121 | 85 | 1.08 |
| 2026/27 | 110 | 91 | 79 | 0.83 |
Places offered
110
in 2026/27
Named first choice
91
456 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
86.8%
79 of 91
Offers to families outside the council
2%
2 of 110 offers
This school was issued a new Department for Education reference when it converted to an academy. Its earlier years are included above, reported at the time under reference 117596.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Goffs - Churchgate Academy published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Looked After Children as defined in section 22 (1) of the Children Act 1989 1 and previously looked after children. Children are previously looked after if they were looked after but ceased to be so because they were adopted or became subject to a special guardianship order or residency order, this 1 a child who is looked after by a local authority is a reference to a child who is— |
| (a) in their care; or | |
| (b) provided with accommodation by the authority in the exercise of any functions (in particular those under this Act) which the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970 includes children previously looked after outside England. The child’s previously Looked After status will be decided in accordance with the definition outlined in The Children and Social Work Act 20172 | |
| 2 | Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school (See note (i) below) |
| 3 | Children who will have an older brother or sister at the school at the time of admission (see note (ii) below) |
| 4 | Children of Staff (both teaching staff and support staff) employed by the school (either on a full or part time basis) (see note (iii) below) |
| 5 | Children attending the named feeder primary schools will be allocated places at the school on a quota basis in the proportions set out below (see notes (v), (v), (vi) and (vii) below) a) Andrews Lane School 8% b) Bonneygrove School 10% c) Brooklands School 13% d) Burleigh School 14% e) Cuffley School 2% f) Dewhurst St Mary’s School 2% g) Downfield School 13% h) Fairfields School 8% i) Flamstead End School 8% j) Goffs Oak School 2% k) Hurst Drive School 11% l) Millbrook School 5% m) St Paul’s School 2% n) Woodside Primary School 2% Please note that the above percentages refer to the percentage of places remaining - following application of criteria 1 to 4 - not the percentage of students in […] criterion continues in the source document |
| i. to have been in state care in a place outside England and Wales because he or she would not otherwise have been cared for adequately, and ii. to have ceased to be in that state care as a result of being adopted. A child is in “state care” if he or she is in the care of, or accommodated by – (a) a public authority, | |
| (b) a religious organisation, or | |
| (c) any other organisation the sole or main purpose of which is to benefit society. If a named feeder primary school does not use its full allocation, any surplus places will be allocated under this criterion to a child/children from the other feeder schools living closest to the school using a straight line distance measurement from each applicant’s home to the school (see note (vi) below). | |
| 6 | Any remaining places will be allocated to children living closest to the school, using HCC’s computerised mapping system (see note (vi) below). In the event of a ‘tie break’ random allocation will be used. Random allocations will be administered by HCC on behalf of the Trustees of the school. Every child entered onto the HCC admissions database has an individual random number assigned between 1 and 1 million, against each preference school. When there is a need for a final tie break the random number is used to allocate the place, with the lowest number given priority. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Goffs - Churchgate Academy's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
600
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
589
98.2% of capacity
Unfilled places
11
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
0
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Goffs - Churchgate Academy has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Goffs - Churchgate Academy reported 11 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 98.2% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Hertfordshire does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Hertfordshire
Postcode EN8 9LY. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 145297).
Other contested secondary schools in Hertfordshire
- Hockerill Anglo-European College 2.49 first choices per place
- Parmiter's School 2.37 first choices per place
- Watford Grammar School for Boys 1.88 first choices per place
- Dame Alice Owen's School 1.78 first choices per place
- Watford Grammar School for Girls 1.77 first choices per place
- Queens' School 1.68 first choices per place
- The Bishop's Stortford High School 1.61 first choices per place
- The Broxbourne School 1.61 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.