Refused a place at St Martin's School Brentwood?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 32 families who named St Martin's School Brentwood as their first choice did not get a place: 289 put it first and 257 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Essex actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
289 first preferences for 316 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at St Martin's School Brentwood
There is no published appeal success rate for St Martin's School Brentwood, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Essex as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Essex, 15.1% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 249 of 1,651 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Essex.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Essex ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
St Martin's School Brentwood turned first-choice families away in 10 of the last 12 years. More families named it first than it had places in 1 of those years. In the other 9 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 273 | 298 | 230 | 1.09 |
| 2016/17 | 272 | 253 | 226 | 0.93 |
| 2017/18 | 279 | 268 | 238 | 0.96 |
| 2018/19 | 290 | 283 | 246 | 0.98 |
| 2019/20 | 290 | 282 | 218 | 0.97 |
| 2020/21 | 290 | 190 | 183 | 0.66 |
| 2021/22 | 286 | 225 | 197 | 0.79 |
| 2022/23 | 323 | 283 | 250 | 0.88 |
| 2023/24 | 292 | 287 | 209 | 0.98 |
| 2024/25 | 291 | 246 | 230 | 0.85 |
| 2025/26 | 287 | 287 | 236 | 1 |
| 2026/27 | 316 | 289 | 257 | 0.91 |
Places offered
316
in 2026/27
Named first choice
289
1,178 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
88.9%
257 of 289
Offers to families outside the council
2%
5 of 316 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria St Martin's School Brentwood published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Looked after and previously looked after children |
| 2 | A ‘looked after child’ is one, who is (a) in the care of a Local Authority, or (b) being provided with accommodation by a Local Authority in the exercise of its social services functions, in England. A ‘previously looked after child’ is one who was looked after in England, but ceased to be so because they were adopted, or became subject to a child arrangements or special guardianship order, as well as a child who appears to have been in state care outside of England (i.e. in the care of, or accommodated by, a public authority, religious organisation or any other provider whose sole/main purpose is to benefit society), but ceased to be so as a result of being adopted. ii. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 3 | Children with a sibling at St. Martin’s School Brentwood in Year 7 to Year 11 at the time of application and admission i. The sibling must be on the roll in Years 7 to 11 at SMS at the time of application and will still be on the roll in Years 7 to 11 at the time of the applicant child's admission. For the avoidance of doubt, siblings who are in Year 12 or 13 at the time of application, or who will be in Year 12 at the time of admission (having transferred from Year 11) will not meet the definition of a 'sibling' for the purpose of this Policy. ii. […] criterion continues in the source document |
| 4 | Children who attend Hogarth Primary School, Kelvedon Hatch Community Primary School or Larchwood Primary School at the time of application i. The applicant child must be on the roll of Hogarth Primary School, Kelvedon Hatch Community Primary School or Larchwood Primary School at the time of application for a place at SMS. |
| 5 | Children living within the Priority Admission Area i. The applicant child's home address (as defined in this Policy) must be located within the Priority Admission Area for SMS as shown in the Priority Admission Area Map available via the SMS website: https://www.st- martins.essex.sch.uk/admissions/priority-admissions-area-map/. |
| 6 | Children applying for a place in Year 7 who demonstrate an aptitude in sport or music i. Up to 29 places (10% of the PAN) for Year 7 will be allocated to children who qualified for consideration of an aptitude place, as set out above at section 4. |
| 7 | Children of staff at St. Martin's School Brentwood i. The staff member may be full or part time, and teaching or non-teaching staff. They must spend more than 50% of their working week during term time based at SMS. For the avoidance of doubt, it is not possible to have priority for more than one DET School. ii. The staff member must have been (a) employed at SMS for two or more years at the time of application on a permanent contract, or two or more consecutive fixed term one-year contracts, and/or (b) recruited to fill a vacant post at SMS for which there is a demonstrable skill shortage. iii. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
St Martin's School Brentwood's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,460
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,402
96% of capacity
Unfilled places
58
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
501
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that St Martin's School Brentwood has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures St Martin's School Brentwood reported 58 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 96% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2011/12 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Essex does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Essex
Postcode CM13 2HG. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136875).
Other contested secondary schools in Essex
- King Edward VI Grammar School, Chelmsford 2.77 first choices per place
- Colchester Royal Grammar School 2.19 first choices per place
- Chelmsford County High School for Girls 2 first choices per place
- Colchester County High School for Girls 1.69 first choices per place
- Becket Keys Church of England Free School 1.56 first choices per place
- The Beaulieu Park School 1.55 first choices per place
- De La Salle School 1.46 first choices per place
- The King John School 1.39 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.