Refused a place at Davenant Foundation School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 39 families who named Davenant Foundation School as their first choice did not get a place: the school offered 185 and 212 put it first.
Below: what an appeal in Essex actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first choices for every place available
212 first preferences for 185 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Davenant Foundation School
There is no published appeal success rate for Davenant Foundation School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Essex as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Essex, 15.1% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 249 of 1,651 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Essex.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Essex ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Davenant Foundation School turned first-choice families away in every one of the 12 years published. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 160 | 259 | 154 | 1.62 |
| 2016/17 | 157 | 219 | 147 | 1.39 |
| 2017/18 | 162 | 198 | 150 | 1.22 |
| 2018/19 | 169 | 253 | 161 | 1.5 |
| 2019/20 | 175 | 262 | 166 | 1.5 |
| 2020/21 | 175 | 252 | 161 | 1.44 |
| 2021/22 | 170 | 236 | 158 | 1.39 |
| 2022/23 | 173 | 209 | 163 | 1.21 |
| 2023/24 | 175 | 217 | 169 | 1.24 |
| 2024/25 | 178 | 206 | 163 | 1.16 |
| 2025/26 | 177 | 183 | 166 | 1.03 |
| 2026/27 | 185 | 212 | 173 | 1.15 |
Places offered
185
in 2026/27
Named first choice
212
532 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
81.6%
173 of 212
Offers to families outside the council
31%
58 of 185 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Davenant Foundation School published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Children who are looked after, or children who were previously looked after, including those children who appear (to the admission authority) to have been in state care outside of England and ceased to be in state care as a result of being adopted. Previously looked after children are those children who were looked after but ceased to be so because they became subject to an adoption, child arrangements order or special guardianship order. |
| 2 | Children of permanent staff, both teachers and support staff employed by the School. Priority will be given to children of staff employed by Davenant in either or both of the following circumstances: where the member of staff has been employed by the School for two years or more at the time at which the application to school is made, and/or the member of staff is recruited to fill a vacant post for which there is a demonstrable skills shortage. Note: for the purposes of this policy a ‘child’ is defined as a biological or legally adopted child of the staff member making the application. |
| 3 | Children of parents committed to the Christian faith, determined by attendance at a place of mainstream Christian worship by at least one parent or legal guardian. Regular worship means attending at least once a fortnight and for at least the past five years at the closing date for applications. A Christian Church is a recognised Anglican Church or another Christian denomination which is a member of the Churches Together in Britain & Ireland, the Evangelical Alliance or Affinity. Church affiliation should be current at the time of application. Clergy referees will be asked to confirm, on the Clergy Reference form which is sent to them by the school, that the place of worship satisfies this |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Davenant Foundation School's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
850
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
909
106.9% of capacity
Over its capacity by
59
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
320
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Davenant Foundation School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Davenant Foundation School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2010/11 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Essex does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Academy converter
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- Faith
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Essex
Postcode IG10 2LD. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 136625).
Other contested secondary schools in Essex
- King Edward VI Grammar School, Chelmsford 2.77 first choices per place
- Colchester Royal Grammar School 2.19 first choices per place
- Chelmsford County High School for Girls 2 first choices per place
- Colchester County High School for Girls 1.69 first choices per place
- Becket Keys Church of England Free School 1.56 first choices per place
- The Beaulieu Park School 1.55 first choices per place
- De La Salle School 1.46 first choices per place
- The King John School 1.39 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.