Refused a place at Beauchamps High School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 16 families who named Beauchamps High School as their first choice did not get a place: 266 put it first and 250 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Essex actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
266 first preferences for 274 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Beauchamps High School
There is no published appeal success rate for Beauchamps High School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Essex as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Essex, 15.1% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 249 of 1,651 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Essex.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Essex ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Beauchamps High School turned first-choice families away in 7 of the last 12 years. In each of those years more families named it as their first choice than it had places available.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 234 | 239 | 215 | 1.02 |
| 2016/17 | 229 | 218 | 209 | 0.95 |
| 2017/18 | 234 | 239 | 215 | 1.02 |
| 2018/19 | 243 | 242 | 231 | 1 |
| 2019/20 | 247 | 208 | 203 | 0.84 |
| 2020/21 | 238 | 205 | 197 | 0.86 |
| 2021/22 | 248 | 281 | 231 | 1.13 |
| 2022/23 | 241 | 268 | 234 | 1.11 |
| 2023/24 | 243 | 316 | 236 | 1.3 |
| 2024/25 | 254 | 303 | 245 | 1.19 |
| 2025/26 | 266 | 273 | 248 | 1.03 |
| 2026/27 | 274 | 266 | 250 | 0.97 |
Places offered
274
in 2026/27
Named first choice
266
847 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
94%
250 of 266
Offers to families outside the council
0%
0 of 274 offers
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria Beauchamps High School published for 2025 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Looked after children and previously looked after children#. |
| 2 | Children of teaching and non-teaching staff who have been directly employed by Beauchamps High School for two or more years at the time of application for admission to the school. Children of staff members who are recruited to fill a vacant post for which there is a demonstrable skill shortage will also receive the same priority. |
| 3 | Children with a sibling‡ attending the school. |
| 4 | Children whose registered main home address is in the priority admission area and has a postcode starting with SS11. |
| 5 | Children whose registered main home address is in the priority admission area and has a postcode starting with SS12. |
| 6 | Any remaining places will be allocated by straight line distance* from the child’s registered main home address to the school. In the event of oversubscription within any of the above criteria, straight line distance* will be used as a tie-breaker, with those living nearest to the school by straight line distance* having highest priority. Parents who wish for their child(ren) to attend Beauchamps High School must apply following the arrangements set out in the scheme for the co-ordination of student admissions in Essex, by the specified closing date. […] criterion continues in the source document |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2025 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
Beauchamps High School's determined admission arrangements for 2025 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,350
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,241
91.9% of capacity
Unfilled places
109
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
236
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Beauchamps High School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Beauchamps High School reported 109 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 91.9% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- How close you had to live. Cut-off distances are set by whoever runs admissions for the school. Essex does not publish them, and no council is required to — the regulations ask only for the admission number and the preferences received. Ask the admission authority directly — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Foundation school
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Essex
Postcode SS11 8LY. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 115322).
Other contested secondary schools in Essex
- King Edward VI Grammar School, Chelmsford 2.77 first choices per place
- Colchester Royal Grammar School 2.19 first choices per place
- Chelmsford County High School for Girls 2 first choices per place
- Colchester County High School for Girls 1.69 first choices per place
- Becket Keys Church of England Free School 1.56 first choices per place
- The Beaulieu Park School 1.55 first choices per place
- De La Salle School 1.46 first choices per place
- The King John School 1.39 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.