Refused a place at The Grange School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 17 families who named The Grange School as their first choice did not get a place: 183 put it first and 166 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Buckinghamshire actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
183 first preferences for 230 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at The Grange School
There is no published appeal success rate for The Grange School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Buckinghamshire as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Buckinghamshire, 12% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 182 of 1,519 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Buckinghamshire.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Buckinghamshire ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
The Grange School turned first-choice families away in 6 of the last 12 years. It has never had more first choices than places, and refused families who named it first anyway — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 234 | 206 | 160 | 0.88 |
| 2016/17 | 233 | 226 | 164 | 0.97 |
| 2017/18 | 236 | 161 | 141 | 0.68 |
| 2018/19 | 236 | 152 | 120 | 0.64 |
| 2019/20 | 234 | 167 | 146 | 0.71 |
| 2020/21 | 230 | 168 | 154 | 0.73 |
| 2021/22 | 269 | 127 | 127 | 0.47 |
| 2022/23 | 234 | 160 | 160 | 0.68 |
| 2023/24 | 233 | 129 | 129 | 0.55 |
| 2024/25 | 228 | 168 | 159 | 0.74 |
| 2025/26 | 229 | 186 | 157 | 0.81 |
| 2026/27 | 230 | 183 | 166 | 0.8 |
Places offered
230
in 2026/27
Named first choice
183
560 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
90.7%
166 of 183
Offers to families outside the council
0%
0 of 230 offers
How close you had to live
The Grange School filled its places in 2026, and 1,675m — 1.04 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under criterion 6 — Distance, which is numbered in the school's own admission arrangements for that year.
Last place offered at
1.04 mi
1,675 metres, 2026
Under criterion
6
Distance
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Buckinghamshire Council, allocation statistics for 2026. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
How places were ranked
These are the oversubscription criteria The Grange School published for 2026 entry, in the order the school itself sets them out. They are the rules the admission authority had to apply when more families applied than there were places — and at the first stage of an appeal, they are the document the panel is looking at.
| Rank | Criterion, as the school words it |
|---|---|
| 1 | A ‘looked after child' or a child who was previously looked after but immediately after being looked after became the subject of an adoption, residence or special guardianship order. (See Note 1) |
| 2 | Children who have exceptional medical or social needs supported by written evidence from a doctor, social worker, educational welfare officer or other appropriate person. (See Note 2) |
| 3 | Children living within the catchment area of the school. (See Note 3) |
| 4 | For the main point of admission: Siblings (See Note 4) of children in Years 7 to 10 who are on the roll of the school at the time allocations are made, and are expected to be on the school roll at the time of the proposed admission. For immediate casual admission after the normal point of entry: Siblings of children who are in Years 7-11 at the time of admission. |
| 5 | Children of members of staff of schools within The Aylesbury Learning Partnership Schools (currently The Grange School; Turnfurlong Infant School; and Turnfurlong Junior School) where the member of staff has been employed at the School for two or more years at the time at which the application is made and / or the member of staff is recruited to fill a vacant post for which there is a demonstrable skill shortage. |
| 6 | Once the above rules have been applied then any further places will be offered in distance order; using the distance between the family's Normal Home Address (See |
The first criterion is not the school's choice. Paragraph 1.7 of the School Admissions Code 2021 requires every admission authority in England to give looked-after and previously looked-after children the highest priority, so it sits at the top of every list of this kind.
Meeting a criterion is not the same as winning an appeal
A panel does not decide your appeal by working through this list again. At the first stage it asks a narrower question: were these arrangements lawful, and were they applied to your application correctly and impartially? If they were, the panel moves to the second stage and weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil — and that stage has nothing to do with which criterion you fell under.
So this list is most useful for checking one thing: whether the school applied its own published rules to you properly. A criterion applied to you in a way the wording does not support is a first-stage point. Simply falling into a lower category is not — that is the system working as published.
These are the criteria determined for 2026 entry. An admission authority must re-determine its arrangements by 15 March each year, so check the school's current version before relying on any of this for a different round.
The Grange School's determined admission arrangements for 2026 entry, published by the admission authority under paragraph 1.47 of the School Admissions Code 2021. Source document. Quoted verbatim; wording, order and numbering are the school's own.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,230
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,246
101.3% of capacity
Over its capacity by
16
reported as full or beyond
Sixth form places
181
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that The Grange School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures The Grange School was at or beyond its stated capacity across Years 7 to 11. A school in that position has a straightforward case that another admission would cause it difficulty, and an appeal here has to succeed on the strength of your child's own circumstances rather than on spare room.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Foundation school
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Buckinghamshire
Postcode HP21 7NH. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 110488).
Other contested secondary schools in Buckinghamshire
- Burnham Grammar School 1.92 first choices per place
- Sir William Borlase's Grammar School 1.76 first choices per place
- Royal Latin School 1.70 first choices per place
- Chesham Grammar School 1.69 first choices per place
- Aylesbury Grammar School 1.60 first choices per place
- Dr Challoner's High School 1.60 first choices per place
- John Hampden Grammar School 1.41 first choices per place
- Aylesbury High School 1.40 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.