Refused a place at Titus Salt School?
You are not alone. In 2026/27, 23 families who named Titus Salt School as their first choice did not get a place: 218 put it first and 195 of them were offered one.
Below: what an appeal in Bradford actually involves, and how contested this school has been over 12 years of official figures.
first-choice families refused a place in 2026/27
218 first preferences for 236 places, 2026/27
Appealing a refusal at Titus Salt School
There is no published appeal success rate for Titus Salt School, or for any individual school in England. The Department for Education collects appeal outcomes and publishes them by council. The figures here are for Bradford as a whole and cover every state-funded school in the authority. Anyone quoting you odds for a named school is making them up.
Across Bradford, 13.3% of secondary appeals heard were upheld — 254 of 1,912 appeals heard in 2024–2026. The England figure is 20.1%.
A panel is not deciding whether you want the school. It decides whether the admission arrangements were lawful and correctly applied, and then whether the harm to your child of not being admitted outweighs the harm to the school of going over its published number. Cases built on preference rather than on those two questions are the ones that fail.
See the full appeal figures for Bradford.
What a panel here can act on
These are national rules, not Bradford ones. Whichever school you are appealing for, the panel works through the same two stages and is required to ignore the same things.
- Infant class size
- A mistake in how the decision was made
- Distance and catchment
- Siblings
- Faith and religious criteria
- Medical and social need
- Special educational needs without an EHC plan
- A late application
- In-year admissions
- Grammar schools and the 11-plus
- Sixth form places
- Twins and multiple births
How contested this school has been
Titus Salt School turned first-choice families away in every one of the 12 years published. More families named it first than it had places in 7 of those years. In the other 5 it had places on paper and still turned first-choice families away — which happens where families who may not meet a school's criteria rank it below a safer choice — common at selective, faith and single-sex schools, and it means the first-preference count understates how wanted the school is.
View as a table
| Year | Places | First choices | Offered | Per place |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 237 | 225 | 193 | 0.95 |
| 2016/17 | 235 | 232 | 172 | 0.99 |
| 2017/18 | 246 | 265 | 217 | 1.08 |
| 2018/19 | 239 | 274 | 218 | 1.15 |
| 2019/20 | 245 | 243 | 207 | 0.99 |
| 2020/21 | 239 | 265 | 218 | 1.11 |
| 2021/22 | 242 | 264 | 228 | 1.09 |
| 2022/23 | 243 | 269 | 225 | 1.11 |
| 2023/24 | 235 | 247 | 205 | 1.05 |
| 2024/25 | 239 | 260 | 213 | 1.09 |
| 2025/26 | 238 | 186 | 166 | 0.78 |
| 2026/27 | 236 | 218 | 195 | 0.92 |
Places offered
236
in 2026/27
Named first choice
218
756 named it at any preference
First choices offered a place
89.4%
195 of 218
Offers to families outside the council
0%
0 of 236 offers
How close you had to live
Titus Salt School filled its places in 2025, and 3,460m — 2.15 miles — is how far away the last child to be offered a place lived. They were admitted under the allocations on distance criterion.
Last place offered at
2.15 mi
3,460 metres, 2025
Under criterion
allocations on distance
as the council described it
This is not a line you passed or failed
A panel cannot refuse your appeal because you live beyond this distance, and cannot allow it because you live inside. The cut-off describes how the arrangements were applied to last year's applicants. At the first stage the panel asks whether the arrangements were lawful and applied to you correctly; at the second it weighs your child's circumstances against the harm to the school of admitting another pupil. Neither question has a distance in it. Families further out than this figure win appeals, and families inside it did not need one.
It also changes every year, because it is set by who happened to apply, not by a boundary the school draws. Last year's figure does not tell you this year's.
Bradford Council, allocation statistics for 2025. Source document. Published under the Open Government Licence. Cut-off distances are not a statutory publication — the School Information (England) Regulations 2008 require only the admission number and the preferences received — so a council publishes these voluntarily and many publish none at all.
Was the school full?
This is the question a panel spends most of its time on. At the second stage of an appeal it weighs the harm to the school of taking an extra child against the harm to your child of being refused — and how much room the school has is the heart of that. The admission authority has to show harm over and above the fact that its published number has been reached, so it is fair to ask what the specific harm is — how the second stage actually works.
Places, Years 7 to 11
1,263
2024/25, whole school
Pupils in them
1,249
98.9% of capacity
Unfilled places
14
across Years 7 to 11
Sixth form places
250
excluded from the figures above
Read this before you use these numbers
These are whole-school figures across Years 7 to 11, not the year group you are appealing for. A school can hold spare places in its upper years while the year you want is genuinely full, and the panel will have the year-group numbers in front of it. So this does not show that Titus Salt School has room for your child.
They are also the school's own reported capacity, as at 1 May 2025 — a year behind the application figures further up this page, and a description rather than a finding.
On the published figures Titus Salt School reported 14 unfilled places across Years 7 to 11, at 98.9% of capacity. That is worth asking about — but ask it as a question, not an assertion. A panel will want the figure for the year group in question, and the school may have a good answer about staffing, rooms or timetabling.
Places and pupils on roll, whole school, 2009/10 to 2024/25
Places Pupils on roll
Department for Education, School capacity, school-level file, 2024/25. Published under the Open Government Licence.
What these figures do not tell you
- Whether this year's cut-off will be the same. The distance above is last year's and it moves with whoever applies — it is not a boundary you can be measured against in advance, and no council publishes next year's — how distance is measured, and when it is arguable.
- How this school decides between applicants. Sibling rules, catchment, faith criteria and tie-breaks are in the school's own admission arrangements. What matters for an appeal is whether they were applied to you correctly — siblings, faith criteria and process mistakes.
- Whether an appeal here succeeds. Appeal outcomes are published by council only. A school being heavily oversubscribed means more families appeal, not that their appeals do better.
About the school
- Type
- Community school
- Admissions policy
- Non-selective
- Religious character
- No religious character
- Entry point
- Year 7
- Council
- Bradford
Postcode BD17 5RH. School details from Get Information About Schools (URN 107395).
Other contested secondary schools in Bradford
- Dixons Kings Academy 2.28 first choices per place
- Dixons City Academy 2.16 first choices per place
- Eden Boys' Leadership Academy, Bradford 1.93 first choices per place
- Feversham Girls' Secondary Academy 1.55 first choices per place
- Beckfoot School 1.49 first choices per place
- Dixons Trinity Academy 1.40 first choices per place
- Carlton Keighley 1.35 first choices per place
- Carlton Bolling 1.27 first choices per place
Applications and offers: Department for Education, Primary and secondary school applications and offers, school-level file, 2026/27. Appeal figures: Admission appeals in England. Both under the Open Government Licence.